Media kit
For journalists, advocates, and organizations. Everything here is copyable. Please represent the campaign accurately: we ask for research and review, not for unregulated sales, and we do not provide sourcing or dosing information.
One-paragraph summary
Short campaign blurb
The core ask
- Delay or narrow the emergency scheduling of SR-17018 specifically.
- Separate SR-17018 from other listed compounds and review it on its own merits.
- Publish the compound-specific evidence being relied upon.
- Preserve lawful research and medical-development access to SR-17018.
- Involve HHS/FDA scientific and medical review before any placement.
- Avoid blocking potential opioid-withdrawal research before it can be studied.
Key facts & identifiers
| Compound | SR-17018 (5,6-dichloro desmethylchlorphine) |
|---|---|
| CAS | 2134602-45-0 |
| Action | Temporary placement in Schedule I (Notice of Intent, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)) |
| Published | July 1, 2026 |
| Federal Register | FR Doc. 2026-13364 (91 FR 39940) verified |
| DEA docket | DEA-1665 verified |
| Regulations.gov | DEA-2026-1024 verified |
Why this matters
- The opioid crisis continues to demand more researched withdrawal-treatment options.
- Schedule I placement can chill legitimate scientific research.
- Consistent anecdotal reports deserve investigation, not overstatement.
- Compound-specific review avoids treating dissimilar substances as identical.
What the campaign is not saying
- We are not saying SR-17018 is proven safe or effective.
- We are not asking for unregulated sales.
- We are not providing sourcing, dosing, or synthesis information.
Suggested media quote
Suggested questions for DEA / HHS / Congress
- What compound-specific evidence supports emergency scheduling of SR-17018, as distinct from the other substances in the notice?
- Has HHS/FDA conducted or been asked to conduct a scientific and medical review specific to SR-17018?
- What is the plan to preserve lawful research access if the compound is temporarily scheduled?
- How will DEA weigh reported opioid-withdrawal applications against the decision to place SR-17018 into Schedule I?
- Will there be an opportunity for scientific input before any permanent scheduling decision?
Anonymized testimonial examples
Examples Illustrative only β not real submissions. Real, moderated stories appear on the stories page.
βAfter years on opioids, I struggled every time I tried to stop. I believe having researched options for withdrawal could change lives. I want compounds like this studied properly, not shut out before we know.β
βI watched someone I love fight to get off opioids. Families like ours need more researched tools, not fewer. I'm asking for careful study, not shortcuts.β
βI'm not claiming this compound is proven. I'm saying the reports are consistent enough that Schedule I placement before compound-specific research would be a mistake for public health.β
For journalists
Questions or interview requests? We aim to respond promptly.
Media contact: press@example.org edit before launch
Email the campaign