Media kit

For journalists, advocates, and organizations. Everything here is copyable. Please represent the campaign accurately: we ask for research and review, not for unregulated sales, and we do not provide sourcing or dosing information.

One-paragraph summary

Short campaign blurb

The core ask

  • Delay or narrow the emergency scheduling of SR-17018 specifically.
  • Separate SR-17018 from other listed compounds and review it on its own merits.
  • Publish the compound-specific evidence being relied upon.
  • Preserve lawful research and medical-development access to SR-17018.
  • Involve HHS/FDA scientific and medical review before any placement.
  • Avoid blocking potential opioid-withdrawal research before it can be studied.

Key facts & identifiers

CompoundSR-17018 (5,6-dichloro desmethylchlorphine)
CAS2134602-45-0
ActionTemporary placement in Schedule I (Notice of Intent, 21 U.S.C. 811(h))
PublishedJuly 1, 2026
Federal RegisterFR Doc. 2026-13364 (91 FR 39940) verified
DEA docketDEA-1665 verified
Regulations.govDEA-2026-1024 verified

Read the Federal Register notice β†’

Why this matters

  • The opioid crisis continues to demand more researched withdrawal-treatment options.
  • Schedule I placement can chill legitimate scientific research.
  • Consistent anecdotal reports deserve investigation, not overstatement.
  • Compound-specific review avoids treating dissimilar substances as identical.

What the campaign is not saying

  • We are not saying SR-17018 is proven safe or effective.
  • We are not asking for unregulated sales.
  • We are not providing sourcing, dosing, or synthesis information.

Suggested media quote

Suggested questions for DEA / HHS / Congress

  • What compound-specific evidence supports emergency scheduling of SR-17018, as distinct from the other substances in the notice?
  • Has HHS/FDA conducted or been asked to conduct a scientific and medical review specific to SR-17018?
  • What is the plan to preserve lawful research access if the compound is temporarily scheduled?
  • How will DEA weigh reported opioid-withdrawal applications against the decision to place SR-17018 into Schedule I?
  • Will there be an opportunity for scientific input before any permanent scheduling decision?

Anonymized testimonial examples

Examples Illustrative only β€” not real submissions. Real, moderated stories appear on the stories page.

β€œAfter years on opioids, I struggled every time I tried to stop. I believe having researched options for withdrawal could change lives. I want compounds like this studied properly, not shut out before we know.”
β€” Anonymous β€” Person with lived experience, Ohio
β€œI watched someone I love fight to get off opioids. Families like ours need more researched tools, not fewer. I'm asking for careful study, not shortcuts.”
β€” Anonymous β€” Family member, Pennsylvania
β€œI'm not claiming this compound is proven. I'm saying the reports are consistent enough that Schedule I placement before compound-specific research would be a mistake for public health.”
β€” Anonymous β€” Clinician, Oregon

For journalists

Questions or interview requests? We aim to respond promptly.

Media contact: press@example.org edit before launch

Email the campaign